Taxa De Câmbio Bitcoin: Bitcoin blockchain data format

Private Blockchain

A subreddit for news on private blockchains
[link]

Please help! How to pull data from Blockchain.info (or equivalent) and put it into csv, xlsx format or R file? Specifically, block number and associated number of transactions per block. /r/Bitcoin

Please help! How to pull data from Blockchain.info (or equivalent) and put it into csv, xlsx format or R file? Specifically, block number and associated number of transactions per block. /Bitcoin submitted by HiIAMCaptainObvious to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

For Cold and Warm Bitcoin Blockchain Game I need historic block header data in ASCII, CSV or json format /r/Bitcoin

For Cold and Warm Bitcoin Blockchain Game I need historic block header data in ASCII, CSV or json format /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

For Cold and Warm Bitcoin Blockchain Game I need historic block header data in ASCII, CSV or json format

Promise is promise. I have promised my students to come with Cold and Warm Bitcoin Game, based on Bitcoin Blockchain block header data, as soon as possible but it took me already months since I am stuck making efforts to download historic block header data in ASCII format, to be entered into mining simulator. A student should play cold and warm game entering his guess nonce as input to let mining algorithm (block hashing) to verify his lucky number.
Other students having known the winning nonce should give him/her commands cold or warm, colder, warmer, hot.
Block number should be random selected and nonce should be entered by a slider
There are many websites offering API to block explorer service but none is known to me to let me download full Bitcoin blockchain historic header data.
For the most services, nonce is missing or is set to "0" by default.
I would greatly appreciate your help and advice.
submitted by GlobalInnovator to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot
Reposting after was mistakenly removed by mods (since resolved - Thanks)
A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important.
For better formatting see https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b
https://preview.redd.it/e8s7dj3ivpq51.png?width=428&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d0463462702637118c7527ebf96e91f4a80b290

Overview

Cosmos

Cosmos is a heterogeneous network of many independent parallel blockchains, each powered by classical BFT consensus algorithms like Tendermint. Developers can easily build custom application specific blockchains, called Zones, through the Cosmos SDK framework. These Zones connect to Hubs, which are specifically designed to connect zones together.
The vision of Cosmos is to have thousands of Zones and Hubs that are Interoperable through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC). Cosmos can also connect to other systems through peg zones, which are specifically designed zones that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Cosmos does not use Sharding with each Zone and Hub being sovereign with their own validator set.
For a more in-depth look at Cosmos and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Cosmos on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Polkadot

Polkadot is a heterogeneous blockchain protocol that connects multiple specialised blockchains into one unified network. It achieves scalability through a sharding infrastructure with multiple blockchains running in parallel, called parachains, that connect to a central chain called the Relay Chain. Developers can easily build custom application specific parachains through the Substrate development framework.
The relay chain validates the state transition of connected parachains, providing shared state across the entire ecosystem. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. This is to ensure that the validity of the entire system can persist, and no individual part is corruptible. The shared state makes it so that the trust assumptions when using parachains are only those of the Relay Chain validator set, and no other. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The hope is to have 100 parachains connect to the relay chain.
For a more in-depth look at Polkadot and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Polkadot on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Avalanche

Avalanche is a platform of platforms, ultimately consisting of thousands of subnets to form a heterogeneous interoperable network of many blockchains, that takes advantage of the revolutionary Avalanche Consensus protocols to provide a secure, globally distributed, interoperable and trustless framework offering unprecedented decentralisation whilst being able to comply with regulatory requirements.
Avalanche allows anyone to create their own tailor-made application specific blockchains, supporting multiple custom virtual machines such as EVM and WASM and written in popular languages like Go (with others coming in the future) rather than lightly used, poorly-understood languages like Solidity. This virtual machine can then be deployed on a custom blockchain network, called a subnet, which consist of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was built with serving financial markets in mind. It has native support for easily creating and trading digital smart assets with complex custom rule sets that define how the asset is handled and traded to ensure regulatory compliance can be met. Interoperability is enabled between blockchains within a subnet as well as between subnets. Like Cosmos and Polkadot, Avalanche is also able to connect to other systems through bridges, through custom virtual machines made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin.
For a more in-depth look at Avalanche and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see here and here
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Avalanche on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Comparison between Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche

A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions. I want to stress that it’s not a case of one platform being the killer of all other platforms, far from it. There won’t be one platform to rule them all, and too often the tribalism has plagued this space. Blockchains are going to completely revolutionise most industries and have a profound effect on the world we know today. It’s still very early in this space with most adoption limited to speculation and trading mainly due to the limitations of Blockchain and current iteration of Ethereum, which all three of these platforms hope to address. For those who just want a quick summary see the image at the bottom of the article. With that said let’s have a look

Scalability

Cosmos

Each Zone and Hub in Cosmos is capable of up to around 1000 transactions per second with bandwidth being the bottleneck in consensus. Cosmos aims to have thousands of Zones and Hubs all connected through IBC. There is no limit on the number of Zones / Hubs that can be created

Polkadot

Parachains in Polkadot are also capable of up to around 1500 transactions per second. A portion of the parachain slots on the Relay Chain will be designated as part of the parathread pool, the performance of a parachain is split between many parathreads offering lower performance and compete amongst themselves in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. The number of parachains is limited by the number of validators on the relay chain, they hope to be able to achieve 100 parachains.

Avalanche

Avalanche is capable of around 4500 transactions per second per subnet, this is based on modest hardware requirements to ensure maximum decentralisation of just 2 CPU cores and 4 GB of Memory and with a validator size of over 2,000 nodes. Performance is CPU-bound and if higher performance is required then more specialised subnets can be created with higher minimum requirements to be able to achieve 10,000 tps+ in a subnet. Avalanche aims to have thousands of subnets (each with multiple virtual machines / blockchains) all interoperable with each other. There is no limit on the number of Subnets that can be created.

Results

All three platforms offer vastly superior performance to the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0. Avalanche with its higher transactions per second, no limit on the number of subnets / blockchains that can be created and the consensus can scale to potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot claims to offer more tps than cosmos, but is limited to the number of parachains (around 100) whereas with Cosmos there is no limit on the number of hubs / zones that can be created. Cosmos is limited to a fairly small validator size of around 200 before performance degrades whereas Polkadot hopes to be able to reach 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit only a small number of validators are assigned to each parachain). Thus Cosmos and Polkadot scores ✅✅
https://preview.redd.it/2o0brllyvpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f62bb696ecaafcf6184da005d5fe0129d504518

Decentralisation

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus is limited to around 200 validators before performance starts to degrade. Whilst there is the Cosmos Hub it is one of many hubs in the network and there is no central hub or limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created.

Polkadot

Polkadot has 1000 validators in the relay chain and these are split up into a small number that validate each parachain (minimum of 14). The relay chain is a central point of failure as all parachains connect to it and the number of parachains is limited depending on the number of validators (they hope to achieve 100 parachains). Due to the limited number of parachain slots available, significant sums of DOT will need to be purchased to win an auction to lease the slot for up to 24 months at a time. Thus likely to lead to only those with enough funds to secure a parachain slot. Parathreads are however an alternative for those that require less and more varied performance for those that can’t secure a parachain slot.

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus scan scale to tens of thousands of validators, even potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus through repeated sub-sampling. The more validators, the faster the network becomes as the load is split between them. There are modest hardware requirements so anyone can run a node and there is no limit on the number of subnets / virtual machines that can be created.

Results

Avalanche offers unparalleled decentralisation using its revolutionary consensus protocols that can scale to millions of validators all participating in consensus at the same time. There is no limit to the number of subnets and virtual machines that can be created, and they can be created by anyone for a small fee, it scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is limited to 200 validators but no limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created, which anyone can create and scores ✅✅. Polkadot hopes to accommodate 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit these are split amongst each of the parachains). The number of parachains is limited and maybe cost prohibitive for many and the relay chain is a ultimately a single point of failure. Whilst definitely not saying it’s centralised and it is more decentralised than many others, just in comparison between the three, it scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/ckfamee0wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4355f145d821fabf7785e238dbc96a5f5ce2846

Latency

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus used in Cosmos reaches finality within 6 seconds. Cosmos consists of many Zones and Hubs that connect to each other. Communication between 2 zones could pass through many hubs along the way, thus also can contribute to latency times depending on the path taken as explained in part two of the articles on Cosmos. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Polkadot

Polkadot provides a Hybrid consensus protocol consisting of Block producing protocol, BABE, and then a finality gadget called GRANDPA that works to agree on a chain, out of many possible forks, by following some simpler fork choice rule. Rather than voting on every block, instead it reaches agreements on chains. As soon as more than 2/3 of validators attest to a chain containing a certain block, all blocks leading up to that one are finalized at once.
If an invalid block is detected after it has been finalised then the relay chain would need to be reverted along with every parachain. This is particularly important when connecting to external blockchains as those don’t share the state of the relay chain and thus can’t be rolled back. The longer the time period, the more secure the network is, as there is more time for additional checks to be performed and reported but at the expense of finality. Finality is reached within 60 seconds between parachains but for external ecosystems like Ethereum their state obviously can’t be rolled back like a parachain and so finality will need to be much longer (60 minutes was suggested in the whitepaper) and discussed in more detail in part three

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus achieves finality within 3 seconds, with most happening sub 1 second, immutable and completely irreversible. Any subnet can connect directly to another without having to go through multiple hops and any VM can talk to another VM within the same subnet as well as external subnets. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Results

With regards to performance far too much emphasis is just put on tps as a metric, the other equally important metric, if not more important with regards to finance is latency. Throughput measures the amount of data at any given time that it can handle whereas latency is the amount of time it takes to perform an action. It’s pointless saying you can process more transactions per second than VISA when it takes 60 seconds for a transaction to complete. Low latency also greatly increases general usability and customer satisfaction, nowadays everyone expects card payments, online payments to happen instantly. Avalanche achieves the best results scoring ✅✅✅, Cosmos with comes in second with 6 second finality ✅✅ and Polkadot with 60 second finality (which may be 60 minutes for external blockchains) scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/kzup5x42wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=320eb4c25dc4fc0f443a7a2f7ff09567871648cd

Shared Security

Cosmos

Every Zone and Hub in Cosmos has their own validator set and different trust assumptions. Cosmos are researching a shared security model where a Hub can validate the state of connected zones for a fee but not released yet. Once available this will make shared security optional rather than mandatory.

Polkadot

Shared Security is mandatory with Polkadot which uses a Shared State infrastructure between the Relay Chain and all of the connected parachains. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. Every parachain makes the same trust assumptions, and as such the relay chain validates state transition and enables seamless interoperability between them. In return for this benefit, they have to purchase DOT and win an auction for one of the available parachain slots.
However, parachains can’t just rely on the relay chain for their security, they will also need to implement censorship resistance measures and utilise proof of work / proof of stake for each parachain as well as discussed in part three, thus parachains can’t just rely on the security of the relay chain, they need to ensure sybil resistance mechanisms using POW and POS are implemented on the parachain as well.

Avalanche

A subnet in Avalanche consists of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. So unlike in Cosmos where each zone / hub has their own validators, A subnet can validate a single or many virtual machines / blockchains with a single validator set. Shared security is optional

Results

Shared security is mandatory in polkadot and a key design decision in its infrastructure. The relay chain validates the state transition of all connected parachains and thus scores ✅✅✅. Subnets in Avalanche can validate state of either a single or many virtual machines. Each subnet can have their own token and shares a validator set, where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. It scores ✅ ✅. Every Zone and Hub in cosmos has their own validator set / token but research is underway to have the hub validate the state transition of connected zones, but as this is still early in the research phase scores ✅ for now.
https://preview.redd.it/pbgyk3o3wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=61c18e12932a250f5633c40633810d0f64520575

Current Adoption

Cosmos

The Cosmos project started in 2016 with an ICO held in April 2017. There are currently around 50 projects building on the Cosmos SDK with a full list can be seen here and filtering for Cosmos SDK . Not all of the projects will necessarily connect using native cosmos sdk and IBC and some have forked parts of the Cosmos SDK and utilise the tendermint consensus such as Binance Chain but have said they will connect in the future.

Polkadot

The Polkadot project started in 2016 with an ICO held in October 2017. There are currently around 70 projects building on Substrate and a full list can be seen here and filtering for Substrate Based. Like with Cosmos not all projects built using substrate will necessarily connect to Polkadot and parachains or parathreads aren’t currently implemented in either the Live or Test network (Kusama) as of the time of this writing.

Avalanche

Avalanche in comparison started much later with Ava Labs being founded in 2018. Avalanche held it’s ICO in July 2020. Due to lot shorter time it has been in development, the number of projects confirmed are smaller with around 14 projects currently building on Avalanche. Due to the customisability of the platform though, many virtual machines can be used within a subnet making the process incredibly easy to port projects over. As an example, it will launch with the Ethereum Virtual Machine which enables byte for byte compatibility and all the tooling like Metamask, Truffle etc. will work, so projects can easily move over to benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. In the future Cosmos and Substrate virtual machines could be implemented on Avalanche.

Results

Whilst it’s still early for all 3 projects (and the entire blockchain space as a whole), there is currently more projects confirmed to be building on Cosmos and Polkadot, mostly due to their longer time in development. Whilst Cosmos has fewer projects, zones are implemented compared to Polkadot which doesn’t currently have parachains. IBC to connect zones and hubs together is due to launch Q2 2021, thus both score ✅✅✅. Avalanche has been in development for a lot shorter time period, but is launching with an impressive feature set right from the start with ability to create subnets, VMs, assets, NFTs, permissioned and permissionless blockchains, cross chain atomic swaps within a subnet, smart contracts, bridge to Ethereum etc. Applications can easily port over from other platforms and use all the existing tooling such as Metamask / Truffle etc but benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. Currently though just based on the number of projects in comparison it scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/4zpi6s85wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e91ade1a86a5d50f4976f3b23a46e9287b08e373

Enterprise Adoption

Cosmos

Cosmos enables permissioned and permissionless zones which can connect to each other with the ability to have full control over who validates the blockchain. For permissionless zones each zone / hub can have their own token and they are in control who validates.

Polkadot

With polkadot the state transition is performed by a small randomly selected assigned group of validators from the relay chain plus with the possibility that state is rolled back if an invalid transaction of any of the other parachains is found. This may pose a problem for enterprises that need complete control over who performs validation for regulatory reasons. In addition due to the limited number of parachain slots available Enterprises would have to acquire and lock up large amounts of a highly volatile asset (DOT) and have the possibility that they are outbid in future auctions and find they no longer can have their parachain validated and parathreads don’t provide the guaranteed performance requirements for the application to function.

Avalanche

Avalanche enables permissioned and permissionless subnets and complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. For example a subnet can be created where its mandatory that all validators are from a certain legal jurisdiction, or they hold a specific license and regulated by the SEC etc. Subnets are also able to scale to tens of thousands of validators, and even potentially millions of nodes, all participating in consensus so every enterprise can run their own node rather than only a small amount. Enterprises don’t have to hold large amounts of a highly volatile asset, but instead pay a fee in AVAX for the creation of the subnets and blockchains which is burnt.

Results

Avalanche provides the customisability to run private permissioned blockchains as well as permissionless where the enterprise is in control over who validates the blockchain, with the ability to use complex rulesets to meet regulatory compliance, thus scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is also able to run permissioned and permissionless zones / hubs so enterprises have full control over who validates a blockchain and scores ✅✅. Polkadot requires locking up large amounts of a highly volatile asset with the possibility of being outbid by competitors and being unable to run the application if the guaranteed performance is required and having to migrate away. The relay chain validates the state transition and can roll back the parachain should an invalid block be detected on another parachain, thus scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/li5jy6u6wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e2a95f1f88e5efbcf9e23c789ae0f002c8eb73fc

Interoperability

Cosmos

Cosmos will connect Hubs and Zones together through its IBC protocol (due to release in Q1 2020). Connecting to blockchains outside of the Cosmos ecosystem would either require the connected blockchain to fork their code to implement IBC or more likely a custom “Peg Zone” will be created specific to work with a particular blockchain it’s trying to bridge to such as Ethereum etc. Each Zone and Hub has different trust levels and connectivity between 2 zones can have different trust depending on which path it takes (this is discussed more in this article). Finality time is low at 6 seconds, but depending on the number of hops, this can increase significantly.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s shared state means each parachain that connects shares the same trust assumptions, of the relay chain validators and that if one blockchain needs to be reverted, all of them will need to be reverted. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Finality time between parachains is around 60 seconds, but longer will be needed (initial figures of 60 minutes in the whitepaper) for connecting to external blockchains. Thus limiting the appeal of connecting two external ecosystems together through Polkadot. Polkadot is also limited in the number of Parachain slots available, thus limiting the amount of blockchains that can be bridged. Parathreads could be used for lower performance bridges, but the speed of future blockchains is only going to increase.

Avalanche

A subnet can validate multiple virtual machines / blockchains and all blockchains within a subnet share the same trust assumptions / validator set, enabling cross chain interoperability. Interoperability is also possible between any other subnet, with the hope Avalanche will consist of thousands of subnets. Each subnet may have a different trust level, but as the primary network consists of all validators then this can be used as a source of trust if required. As Avalanche supports many virtual machines, bridges to other ecosystems are created by running the connected virtual machine. There will be an Ethereum bridge using the EVM shortly after mainnet. Finality time is much faster at sub 3 seconds (with most happening under 1 second) with no chance of rolling back so more appealing when connecting to external blockchains.

Results

All 3 systems are able to perform interoperability within their ecosystem and transfer assets as well as data, as well as use bridges to connect to external blockchains. Cosmos has different trust levels between its zones and hubs and can create issues depending on which path it takes and additional latency added. Polkadot provides the same trust assumptions for all connected parachains but has long finality and limited number of parachain slots available. Avalanche provides the same trust assumptions for all blockchains within a subnet, and different trust levels between subnets. However due to the primary network consisting of all validators it can be used for trust. Avalanche also has a much faster finality time with no limitation on the number of blockchains / subnets / bridges that can be created. Overall all three blockchains excel with interoperability within their ecosystem and each score ✅✅.
https://preview.redd.it/ai0bkbq8wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e85ee6a3c4670f388ccea00b0c906c3fb51e415

Tokenomics

Cosmos

The ATOM token is the native token for the Cosmos Hub. It is commonly mistaken by people that think it’s the token used throughout the cosmos ecosystem, whereas it’s just used for one of many hubs in Cosmos, each with their own token. Currently ATOM has little utility as IBC isn’t released and has no connections to other zones / hubs. Once IBC is released zones may prefer to connect to a different hub instead and so ATOM is not used. ATOM isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for ATOM as of the time of this writing is $1 Billion with 203 million circulating supply. Rewards can be earnt through staking to offset the dilution caused by inflation. Delegators can also get slashed and lose a portion of their ATOM should the validator misbehave.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s native token is DOT and it’s used to secure the Relay Chain. Each parachain needs to acquire sufficient DOT to win an auction on an available parachain lease period of up to 24 months at a time. Parathreads have a fixed fee for registration that would realistically be much lower than the cost of acquiring a parachain slot and compete with other parathreads in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. DOT isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for DOT as of the time of this writing is $4.4 Billion with 852 million circulating supply. Delegators can also get slashed and lose their DOT (potentially 100% of their DOT for serious attacks) should the validator misbehave.

Avalanche

AVAX is the native token for the primary network in Avalanche. Every validator of any subnet also has to validate the primary network and stake a minimum of 2000 AVAX. There is no limit to the number of validators like other consensus methods then this can cater for tens of thousands even potentially millions of validators. As every validator validates the primary network, this can be a source of trust for interoperability between subnets as well as connecting to other ecosystems, thus increasing amount of transaction fees of AVAX. There is no slashing in Avalanche, so there is no risk to lose your AVAX when selecting a validator, instead rewards earnt for staking can be slashed should the validator misbehave. Because Avalanche doesn’t have direct slashing, it is technically possible for someone to both stake AND deliver tokens for something like a flash loan, under the invariant that all tokens that are staked are returned, thus being able to make profit with staked tokens outside of staking itself.
There will also be a separate subnet for Athereum which is a ‘spoon,’ or friendly fork, of Ethereum, which benefits from the Avalanche consensus protocol and applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. It’s native token ATH will be airdropped to ETH holders as well as potentially AVAX holders as well. This can be done for other blockchains as well.
Transaction fees on the primary network for all 3 of the blockchains as well as subscription fees for creating a subnet and blockchain are paid in AVAX and are burnt, creating deflationary pressure. AVAX is a fixed capped supply of 720 million tokens, creating scarcity rather than an unlimited supply which continuously increase of tokens at a compounded rate each year like others. Initially there will be 360 tokens minted at Mainnet with vesting periods between 1 and 10 years, with tokens gradually unlocking each quarter. The Circulating supply is 24.5 million AVAX with tokens gradually released each quater. The current market cap of AVAX is around $100 million.

Results

Avalanche’s AVAX with its fixed capped supply, deflationary pressure, very strong utility, potential to receive air drops and low market cap, means it scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot’s DOT also has very strong utility with the need for auctions to acquire parachain slots, but has no deflationary mechanisms, no fixed capped supply and already valued at $3.8 billion, therefore scores ✅✅. Cosmos’s ATOM token is only for the Cosmos Hub, of which there will be many hubs in the ecosystem and has very little utility currently. (this may improve once IBC is released and if Cosmos hub actually becomes the hub that people want to connect to and not something like Binance instead. There is no fixed capped supply and currently valued at $1.1 Billion, so scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/mels7myawpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=df9782e2c0a4c26b61e462746256bdf83b1fb906
All three are excellent projects and have similarities as well as many differences. Just to reiterate this article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions, you may have different criteria which is important to you, and score them differently. There won’t be one platform to rule them all however, with some uses cases better suited to one platform over another, and it’s not a zero-sum game. Blockchain is going to completely revolutionize industries and the Internet itself. The more projects researching and delivering breakthrough technology the better, each learning from each other and pushing each other to reach that goal earlier. The current market is a tiny speck of what’s in store in terms of value and adoption and it’s going to be exciting to watch it unfold.
https://preview.redd.it/dbb99egcwpq51.png?width=1388&format=png&auto=webp&s=aeb03127dc0dc74d0507328e899db1c7d7fc2879
For more information see the articles below (each with additional sources at the bottom of their articles)
Avalanche, a Revolutionary Consensus Engine and Platform. A Game Changer for Blockchain
Avalanche Consensus, The Biggest Breakthrough since Nakamoto
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two
Cosmos Hub ATOM Token and the commonly misunderstood staking tokens — Part Three
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One — Overview and Benefits
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two — How Consensus Works
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Three — Limitations and Issues
submitted by xSeq22x to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Gridcoin 5.0.0.0-Mandatory "Fern" Release

https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Research/releases/tag/5.0.0.0
Finally! After over ten months of development and testing, "Fern" has arrived! This is a whopper. 240 pull requests merged. Essentially a complete rewrite that was started with the scraper (the "neural net" rewrite) in "Denise" has now been completed. Practically the ENTIRE Gridcoin specific codebase resting on top of the vanilla Bitcoin/Peercoin/Blackcoin vanilla PoS code has been rewritten. This removes the team requirement at last (see below), although there are many other important improvements besides that.
Fern was a monumental undertaking. We had to encode all of the old rules active for the v10 block protocol in new code and ensure that the new code was 100% compatible. This had to be done in such a way as to clear out all of the old spaghetti and ring-fence it with tightly controlled class implementations. We then wrote an entirely new, simplified ruleset for research rewards and reengineered contracts (which includes beacon management, polls, and voting) using properly classed code. The fundamentals of Gridcoin with this release are now on a very sound and maintainable footing, and the developers believe the codebase as updated here will serve as the fundamental basis for Gridcoin's future roadmap.
We have been testing this for MONTHS on testnet in various stages. The v10 (legacy) compatibility code has been running on testnet continuously as it was developed to ensure compatibility with existing nodes. During the last few months, we have done two private testnet forks and then the full public testnet testing for v11 code (the new protocol which is what Fern implements). The developers have also been running non-staking "sentinel" nodes on mainnet with this code to verify that the consensus rules are problem-free for the legacy compatibility code on the broader mainnet. We believe this amount of testing is going to result in a smooth rollout.
Given the amount of changes in Fern, I am presenting TWO changelogs below. One is high level, which summarizes the most significant changes in the protocol. The second changelog is the detailed one in the usual format, and gives you an inkling of the size of this release.

Highlights

Protocol

Note that the protocol changes will not become active until we cross the hard-fork transition height to v11, which has been set at 2053000. Given current average block spacing, this should happen around October 4, about one month from now.
Note that to get all of the beacons in the network on the new protocol, we are requiring ALL beacons to be validated. A two week (14 day) grace period is provided by the code, starting at the time of the transition height, for people currently holding a beacon to validate the beacon and prevent it from expiring. That means that EVERY CRUNCHER must advertise and validate their beacon AFTER the v11 transition (around Oct 4th) and BEFORE October 18th (or more precisely, 14 days from the actual date of the v11 transition). If you do not advertise and validate your beacon by this time, your beacon will expire and you will stop earning research rewards until you advertise and validate a new beacon. This process has been made much easier by a brand new beacon "wizard" that helps manage beacon advertisements and renewals. Once a beacon has been validated and is a v11 protocol beacon, the normal 180 day expiration rules apply. Note, however, that the 180 day expiration on research rewards has been removed with the Fern update. This means that while your beacon might expire after 180 days, your earned research rewards will be retained and can be claimed by advertising a beacon with the same CPID and going through the validation process again. In other words, you do not lose any earned research rewards if you do not stake a block within 180 days and keep your beacon up-to-date.
The transition height is also when the team requirement will be relaxed for the network.

GUI

Besides the beacon wizard, there are a number of improvements to the GUI, including new UI transaction types (and icons) for staking the superblock, sidestake sends, beacon advertisement, voting, poll creation, and transactions with a message. The main screen has been revamped with a better summary section, and better status icons. Several changes under the hood have improved GUI performance. And finally, the diagnostics have been revamped.

Blockchain

The wallet sync speed has been DRASTICALLY improved. A decent machine with a good network connection should be able to sync the entire mainnet blockchain in less than 4 hours. A fast machine with a really fast network connection and a good SSD can do it in about 2.5 hours. One of our goals was to reduce or eliminate the reliance on snapshots for mainnet, and I think we have accomplished that goal with the new sync speed. We have also streamlined the in-memory structures for the blockchain which shaves some memory use.
There are so many goodies here it is hard to summarize them all.
I would like to thank all of the contributors to this release, but especially thank @cyrossignol, whose incredible contributions formed the backbone of this release. I would also like to pay special thanks to @barton2526, @caraka, and @Quezacoatl1, who tirelessly helped during the testing and polishing phase on testnet with testing and repeated builds for all architectures.
The developers are proud to present this release to the community and we believe this represents the starting point for a true renaissance for Gridcoin!

Summary Changelog

Accrual

Changed

Most significantly, nodes calculate research rewards directly from the magnitudes in EACH superblock between stakes instead of using a two- or three- point average based on a CPID's current magnitude and the magnitude for the CPID when it last staked. For those long-timers in the community, this has been referred to as "Superblock Windows," and was first done in proof-of-concept form by @denravonska.

Removed

Beacons

Added

Changed

Removed

Unaltered

As a reminder:

Superblocks

Added

Changed

Removed

Voting

Added

Changed

Removed

Detailed Changelog

[5.0.0.0] 2020-09-03, mandatory, "Fern"

Added

Changed

Removed

Fixed

submitted by jamescowens to gridcoin [link] [comments]

[ CryptoCurrency ] Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot

[ 🔴 DELETED 🔴 ] Topic originally posted in CryptoCurrency by xSeq22x [link]
A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important.
For better formatting see https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b
https://preview.redd.it/lg16iwk2dhq51.png?width=428&format=png&auto=webp&s=6c899ee69800dd6c5e2900d8fa83de7a43c57086

Overview

Cosmos

Cosmos is a heterogeneous network of many independent parallel blockchains, each powered by classical BFT consensus algorithms like Tendermint. Developers can easily build custom application specific blockchains, called Zones, through the Cosmos SDK framework. These Zones connect to Hubs, which are specifically designed to connect zones together.
The vision of Cosmos is to have thousands of Zones and Hubs that are Interoperable through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC). Cosmos can also connect to other systems through peg zones, which are specifically designed zones that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Cosmos does not use Sharding with each Zone and Hub being sovereign with their own validator set.
For a more in-depth look at Cosmos and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
https://youtu.be/Eb8xkDi_PUg

Polkadot

Polkadot is a heterogeneous blockchain protocol that connects multiple specialised blockchains into one unified network. It achieves scalability through a sharding infrastructure with multiple blockchains running in parallel, called parachains, that connect to a central chain called the Relay Chain. Developers can easily build custom application specific parachains through the Substrate development framework.
The relay chain validates the state transition of connected parachains, providing shared state across the entire ecosystem. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. This is to ensure that the validity of the entire system can persist, and no individual part is corruptible. The shared state makes it so that the trust assumptions when using parachains are only those of the Relay Chain validator set, and no other. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The hope is to have 100 parachains connect to the relay chain.
For a more in-depth look at Polkadot and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
https://youtu.be/_-k0xkooSlA

Avalanche

Avalanche is a platform of platforms, ultimately consisting of thousands of subnets to form a heterogeneous interoperable network of many blockchains, that takes advantage of the revolutionary Avalanche Consensus protocols to provide a secure, globally distributed, interoperable and trustless framework offering unprecedented decentralisation whilst being able to comply with regulatory requirements.
Avalanche allows anyone to create their own tailor-made application specific blockchains, supporting multiple custom virtual machines such as EVM and WASM and written in popular languages like Go (with others coming in the future) rather than lightly used, poorly-understood languages like Solidity. This virtual machine can then be deployed on a custom blockchain network, called a subnet, which consist of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was built with serving financial markets in mind. It has native support for easily creating and trading digital smart assets with complex custom rule sets that define how the asset is handled and traded to ensure regulatory compliance can be met. Interoperability is enabled between blockchains within a subnet as well as between subnets. Like Cosmos and Polkadot, Avalanche is also able to connect to other systems through bridges, through custom virtual machines made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin.
For a more in-depth look at Avalanche and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see here and here
https://youtu.be/mWBzFmzzBAg

Comparison between Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche

A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions. I want to stress that it’s not a case of one platform being the killer of all other platforms, far from it. There won’t be one platform to rule them all, and too often the tribalism has plagued this space. Blockchains are going to completely revolutionise most industries and have a profound effect on the world we know today. It’s still very early in this space with most adoption limited to speculation and trading mainly due to the limitations of Blockchain and current iteration of Ethereum, which all three of these platforms hope to address. For those who just want a quick summary see the image at the bottom of the article. With that said let’s have a look

Scalability

Cosmos

Each Zone and Hub in Cosmos is capable of up to around 1000 transactions per second with bandwidth being the bottleneck in consensus. Cosmos aims to have thousands of Zones and Hubs all connected through IBC. There is no limit on the number of Zones / Hubs that can be created

Polkadot

Parachains in Polkadot are also capable of up to around 1500 transactions per second. A portion of the parachain slots on the Relay Chain will be designated as part of the parathread pool, the performance of a parachain is split between many parathreads offering lower performance and compete amongst themselves in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. The number of parachains is limited by the number of validators on the relay chain, they hope to be able to achieve 100 parachains.

Avalanche

Avalanche is capable of around 4500 transactions per second per subnet, this is based on modest hardware requirements to ensure maximum decentralisation of just 2 CPU cores and 4 GB of Memory and with a validator size of over 2,000 nodes. Performance is CPU-bound and if higher performance is required then more specialised subnets can be created with higher minimum requirements to be able to achieve 10,000 tps+ in a subnet. Avalanche aims to have thousands of subnets (each with multiple virtual machines / blockchains) all interoperable with each other. There is no limit on the number of Subnets that can be created.

Results

All three platforms offer vastly superior performance to the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0. Avalanche with its higher transactions per second, no limit on the number of subnets / blockchains that can be created and the consensus can scale to potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot claims to offer more tps than cosmos, but is limited to the number of parachains (around 100) whereas with Cosmos there is no limit on the number of hubs / zones that can be created. Cosmos is limited to a fairly small validator size of around 200 before performance degrades whereas Polkadot hopes to be able to reach 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit only a small number of validators are assigned to each parachain). Thus Cosmos and Polkadot scores ✅✅
https://preview.redd.it/ththwq5qdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=92f75152c90d984911db88ed174ebf3a147ca70d

Decentralisation

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus is limited to around 200 validators before performance starts to degrade. Whilst there is the Cosmos Hub it is one of many hubs in the network and there is no central hub or limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created.

Polkadot

Polkadot has 1000 validators in the relay chain and these are split up into a small number that validate each parachain (minimum of 14). The relay chain is a central point of failure as all parachains connect to it and the number of parachains is limited depending on the number of validators (they hope to achieve 100 parachains). Due to the limited number of parachain slots available, significant sums of DOT will need to be purchased to win an auction to lease the slot for up to 24 months at a time. Thus likely to lead to only those with enough funds to secure a parachain slot. Parathreads are however an alternative for those that require less and more varied performance for those that can’t secure a parachain slot.

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus scan scale to tens of thousands of validators, even potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus through repeated sub-sampling. The more validators, the faster the network becomes as the load is split between them. There are modest hardware requirements so anyone can run a node and there is no limit on the number of subnets / virtual machines that can be created.

Results

Avalanche offers unparalleled decentralisation using its revolutionary consensus protocols that can scale to millions of validators all participating in consensus at the same time. There is no limit to the number of subnets and virtual machines that can be created, and they can be created by anyone for a small fee, it scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is limited to 200 validators but no limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created, which anyone can create and scores ✅✅. Polkadot hopes to accommodate 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit these are split amongst each of the parachains). The number of parachains is limited and maybe cost prohibitive for many and the relay chain is a ultimately a single point of failure. Whilst definitely not saying it’s centralised and it is more decentralised than many others, just in comparison between the three, it scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/lv2h7g9sdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=56eada6e8c72dbb4406d7c5377ad15608bcc730e

Latency

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus used in Cosmos reaches finality within 6 seconds. Cosmos consists of many Zones and Hubs that connect to each other. Communication between 2 zones could pass through many hubs along the way, thus also can contribute to latency times depending on the path taken as explained in part two of the articles on Cosmos. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Polkadot

Polkadot provides a Hybrid consensus protocol consisting of Block producing protocol, BABE, and then a finality gadget called GRANDPA that works to agree on a chain, out of many possible forks, by following some simpler fork choice rule. Rather than voting on every block, instead it reaches agreements on chains. As soon as more than 2/3 of validators attest to a chain containing a certain block, all blocks leading up to that one are finalized at once.
If an invalid block is detected after it has been finalised then the relay chain would need to be reverted along with every parachain. This is particularly important when connecting to external blockchains as those don’t share the state of the relay chain and thus can’t be rolled back. The longer the time period, the more secure the network is, as there is more time for additional checks to be performed and reported but at the expense of finality. Finality is reached within 60 seconds between parachains but for external ecosystems like Ethereum their state obviously can’t be rolled back like a parachain and so finality will need to be much longer (60 minutes was suggested in the whitepaper) and discussed in more detail in part three

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus achieves finality within 3 seconds, with most happening sub 1 second, immutable and completely irreversible. Any subnet can connect directly to another without having to go through multiple hops and any VM can talk to another VM within the same subnet as well as external subnets. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Results

With regards to performance far too much emphasis is just put on tps as a metric, the other equally important metric, if not more important with regards to finance is latency. Throughput measures the amount of data at any given time that it can handle whereas latency is the amount of time it takes to perform an action. It’s pointless saying you can process more transactions per second than VISA when it takes 60 seconds for a transaction to complete. Low latency also greatly increases general usability and customer satisfaction, nowadays everyone expects card payments, online payments to happen instantly. Avalanche achieves the best results scoring ✅✅✅, Cosmos with comes in second with 6 second finality ✅✅ and Polkadot with 60 second finality (which may be 60 minutes for external blockchains) scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/qe8e5ltudhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=18a2866104590f81a818690337f9121161dda890

Shared Security

Cosmos

Every Zone and Hub in Cosmos has their own validator set and different trust assumptions. Cosmos are researching a shared security model where a Hub can validate the state of connected zones for a fee but not released yet. Once available this will make shared security optional rather than mandatory.

Polkadot

Shared Security is mandatory with Polkadot which uses a Shared State infrastructure between the Relay Chain and all of the connected parachains. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. Every parachain makes the same trust assumptions, and as such the relay chain validates state transition and enables seamless interoperability between them. In return for this benefit, they have to purchase DOT and win an auction for one of the available parachain slots.
However, parachains can’t just rely on the relay chain for their security, they will also need to implement censorship resistance measures and utilise proof of work / proof of stake for each parachain as well as discussed in part three, thus parachains can’t just rely on the security of the relay chain, they need to ensure sybil resistance mechanisms using POW and POS are implemented on the parachain as well.

Avalanche

A subnet in Avalanche consists of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. So unlike in Cosmos where each zone / hub has their own validators, A subnet can validate a single or many virtual machines / blockchains with a single validator set. Shared security is optional

Results

Shared security is mandatory in polkadot and a key design decision in its infrastructure. The relay chain validates the state transition of all connected parachains and thus scores ✅✅✅. Subnets in Avalanche can validate state of either a single or many virtual machines. Each subnet can have their own token and shares a validator set, where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. It scores ✅ ✅. Every Zone and Hub in cosmos has their own validator set / token but research is underway to have the hub validate the state transition of connected zones, but as this is still early in the research phase scores ✅ for now.
https://preview.redd.it/0mnvpnzwdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=8927ff2821415817265be75c59261f83851a2791

Current Adoption

Cosmos

The Cosmos project started in 2016 with an ICO held in April 2017. There are currently around 50 projects building on the Cosmos SDK with a full list can be seen here and filtering for Cosmos SDK . Not all of the projects will necessarily connect using native cosmos sdk and IBC and some have forked parts of the Cosmos SDK and utilise the tendermint consensus such as Binance Chain but have said they will connect in the future.

Polkadot

The Polkadot project started in 2016 with an ICO held in October 2017. There are currently around 70 projects building on Substrate and a full list can be seen here and filtering for Substrate Based. Like with Cosmos not all projects built using substrate will necessarily connect to Polkadot and parachains or parathreads aren’t currently implemented in either the Live or Test network (Kusama) as of the time of this writing.

Avalanche

Avalanche in comparison started much later with Ava Labs being founded in 2018. Avalanche held it’s ICO in July 2020. Due to lot shorter time it has been in development, the number of projects confirmed are smaller with around 14 projects currently building on Avalanche. Due to the customisability of the platform though, many virtual machines can be used within a subnet making the process incredibly easy to port projects over. As an example, it will launch with the Ethereum Virtual Machine which enables byte for byte compatibility and all the tooling like Metamask, Truffle etc. will work, so projects can easily move over to benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. In the future Cosmos and Substrate virtual machines could be implemented on Avalanche.

Results

Whilst it’s still early for all 3 projects (and the entire blockchain space as a whole), there is currently more projects confirmed to be building on Cosmos and Polkadot, mostly due to their longer time in development. Whilst Cosmos has fewer projects, zones are implemented compared to Polkadot which doesn’t currently have parachains. IBC to connect zones and hubs together is due to launch Q2 2021, thus both score ✅✅✅. Avalanche has been in development for a lot shorter time period, but is launching with an impressive feature set right from the start with ability to create subnets, VMs, assets, NFTs, permissioned and permissionless blockchains, cross chain atomic swaps within a subnet, smart contracts, bridge to Ethereum etc. Applications can easily port over from other platforms and use all the existing tooling such as Metamask / Truffle etc but benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. Currently though just based on the number of projects in comparison it scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/rsctxi6zdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff762dea3cfc2aaaa3c8fc7b1070d5be6759aac2

Enterprise Adoption

Cosmos

Cosmos enables permissioned and permissionless zones which can connect to each other with the ability to have full control over who validates the blockchain. For permissionless zones each zone / hub can have their own token and they are in control who validates.

Polkadot

With polkadot the state transition is performed by a small randomly selected assigned group of validators from the relay chain plus with the possibility that state is rolled back if an invalid transaction of any of the other parachains is found. This may pose a problem for enterprises that need complete control over who performs validation for regulatory reasons. In addition due to the limited number of parachain slots available Enterprises would have to acquire and lock up large amounts of a highly volatile asset (DOT) and have the possibility that they are outbid in future auctions and find they no longer can have their parachain validated and parathreads don’t provide the guaranteed performance requirements for the application to function.

Avalanche

Avalanche enables permissioned and permissionless subnets and complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. For example a subnet can be created where its mandatory that all validators are from a certain legal jurisdiction, or they hold a specific license and regulated by the SEC etc. Subnets are also able to scale to tens of thousands of validators, and even potentially millions of nodes, all participating in consensus so every enterprise can run their own node rather than only a small amount. Enterprises don’t have to hold large amounts of a highly volatile asset, but instead pay a fee in AVAX for the creation of the subnets and blockchains which is burnt.

Results

Avalanche provides the customisability to run private permissioned blockchains as well as permissionless where the enterprise is in control over who validates the blockchain, with the ability to use complex rulesets to meet regulatory compliance, thus scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is also able to run permissioned and permissionless zones / hubs so enterprises have full control over who validates a blockchain and scores ✅✅. Polkadot requires locking up large amounts of a highly volatile asset with the possibility of being outbid by competitors and being unable to run the application if the guaranteed performance is required and having to migrate away. The relay chain validates the state transition and can roll back the parachain should an invalid block be detected on another parachain, thus scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/7phaylb1ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=d86d2ec49de456403edbaf27009ed0e25609fbff

Interoperability

Cosmos

Cosmos will connect Hubs and Zones together through its IBC protocol (due to release in Q1 2020). Connecting to blockchains outside of the Cosmos ecosystem would either require the connected blockchain to fork their code to implement IBC or more likely a custom “Peg Zone” will be created specific to work with a particular blockchain it’s trying to bridge to such as Ethereum etc. Each Zone and Hub has different trust levels and connectivity between 2 zones can have different trust depending on which path it takes (this is discussed more in this article). Finality time is low at 6 seconds, but depending on the number of hops, this can increase significantly.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s shared state means each parachain that connects shares the same trust assumptions, of the relay chain validators and that if one blockchain needs to be reverted, all of them will need to be reverted. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Finality time between parachains is around 60 seconds, but longer will be needed (initial figures of 60 minutes in the whitepaper) for connecting to external blockchains. Thus limiting the appeal of connecting two external ecosystems together through Polkadot. Polkadot is also limited in the number of Parachain slots available, thus limiting the amount of blockchains that can be bridged. Parathreads could be used for lower performance bridges, but the speed of future blockchains is only going to increase.

Avalanche

A subnet can validate multiple virtual machines / blockchains and all blockchains within a subnet share the same trust assumptions / validator set, enabling cross chain interoperability. Interoperability is also possible between any other subnet, with the hope Avalanche will consist of thousands of subnets. Each subnet may have a different trust level, but as the primary network consists of all validators then this can be used as a source of trust if required. As Avalanche supports many virtual machines, bridges to other ecosystems are created by running the connected virtual machine. There will be an Ethereum bridge using the EVM shortly after mainnet. Finality time is much faster at sub 3 seconds (with most happening under 1 second) with no chance of rolling back so more appealing when connecting to external blockchains.

Results

All 3 systems are able to perform interoperability within their ecosystem and transfer assets as well as data, as well as use bridges to connect to external blockchains. Cosmos has different trust levels between its zones and hubs and can create issues depending on which path it takes and additional latency added. Polkadot provides the same trust assumptions for all connected parachains but has long finality and limited number of parachain slots available. Avalanche provides the same trust assumptions for all blockchains within a subnet, and different trust levels between subnets. However due to the primary network consisting of all validators it can be used for trust. Avalanche also has a much faster finality time with no limitation on the number of blockchains / subnets / bridges that can be created. Overall all three blockchains excel with interoperability within their ecosystem and each score ✅✅.
https://preview.redd.it/l775gue3ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=b7c4b5802ceb1a9307bd2a8d65f393d1bcb0d7c6

Tokenomics

Cosmos

The ATOM token is the native token for the Cosmos Hub. It is commonly mistaken by people that think it’s the token used throughout the cosmos ecosystem, whereas it’s just used for one of many hubs in Cosmos, each with their own token. Currently ATOM has little utility as IBC isn’t released and has no connections to other zones / hubs. Once IBC is released zones may prefer to connect to a different hub instead and so ATOM is not used. ATOM isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for ATOM as of the time of this writing is $1 Billion with 203 million circulating supply. Rewards can be earnt through staking to offset the dilution caused by inflation. Delegators can also get slashed and lose a portion of their ATOM should the validator misbehave.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s native token is DOT and it’s used to secure the Relay Chain. Each parachain needs to acquire sufficient DOT to win an auction on an available parachain lease period of up to 24 months at a time. Parathreads have a fixed fee for registration that would realistically be much lower than the cost of acquiring a parachain slot and compete with other parathreads in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. DOT isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for DOT as of the time of this writing is $4.4 Billion with 852 million circulating supply. Delegators can also get slashed and lose their DOT (potentially 100% of their DOT for serious attacks) should the validator misbehave.

Avalanche

AVAX is the native token for the primary network in Avalanche. Every validator of any subnet also has to validate the primary network and stake a minimum of 2000 AVAX. There is no limit to the number of validators like other consensus methods then this can cater for tens of thousands even potentially millions of validators. As every validator validates the primary network, this can be a source of trust for interoperability between subnets as well as connecting to other ecosystems, thus increasing amount of transaction fees of AVAX. There is no slashing in Avalanche, so there is no risk to lose your AVAX when selecting a validator, instead rewards earnt for staking can be slashed should the validator misbehave. Because Avalanche doesn’t have direct slashing, it is technically possible for someone to both stake AND deliver tokens for something like a flash loan, under the invariant that all tokens that are staked are returned, thus being able to make profit with staked tokens outside of staking itself.
There will also be a separate subnet for Athereum which is a ‘spoon,’ or friendly fork, of Ethereum, which benefits from the Avalanche consensus protocol and applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. It’s native token ATH will be airdropped to ETH holders as well as potentially AVAX holders as well. This can be done for other blockchains as well.
Transaction fees on the primary network for all 3 of the blockchains as well as subscription fees for creating a subnet and blockchain are paid in AVAX and are burnt, creating deflationary pressure. AVAX is a fixed capped supply of 720 million tokens, creating scarcity rather than an unlimited supply which continuously increase of tokens at a compounded rate each year like others. Initially there will be 360 tokens minted at Mainnet with vesting periods between 1 and 10 years, with tokens gradually unlocking each quarter. The Circulating supply is 24.5 million AVAX with tokens gradually released each quater. The current market cap of AVAX is around $100 million.

Results

Avalanche’s AVAX with its fixed capped supply, deflationary pressure, very strong utility, potential to receive air drops and low market cap, means it scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot’s DOT also has very strong utility with the need for auctions to acquire parachain slots, but has no deflationary mechanisms, no fixed capped supply and already valued at $3.8 billion, therefore scores ✅✅. Cosmos’s ATOM token is only for the Cosmos Hub, of which there will be many hubs in the ecosystem and has very little utility currently. (this may improve once IBC is released and if Cosmos hub actually becomes the hub that people want to connect to and not something like Binance instead. There is no fixed capped supply and currently valued at $1.1 Billion, so scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/zb72eto5ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ee102a2881d763296ad9ffba20667f531d2fd7a
All three are excellent projects and have similarities as well as many differences. Just to reiterate this article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions, you may have different criteria which is important to you, and score them differently. There won’t be one platform to rule them all however, with some uses cases better suited to one platform over another, and it’s not a zero-sum game. Blockchain is going to completely revolutionize industries and the Internet itself. The more projects researching and delivering breakthrough technology the better, each learning from each other and pushing each other to reach that goal earlier. The current market is a tiny speck of what’s in store in terms of value and adoption and it’s going to be exciting to watch it unfold.
https://preview.redd.it/fwi3clz7ehq51.png?width=1388&format=png&auto=webp&s=c91c1645a4c67defd5fc3aaec84f4a765e1c50b6
xSeq22x your post has been copied because one or more comments in this topic have been removed. This copy will preserve unmoderated topic. If you would like to opt-out, please send a message using [this link].
submitted by anticensor_bot to u/anticensor_bot [link] [comments]

[OWL WATCH] Waiting for "IOTA TIME" 14;

Disclaimer: This is my editing, so there could be some errors, misunderstandings or exaggerations.
Waiting for "IOTA TIME " (an era where IOTA defines nearly everything in terms of the block-chain world)

niels12어제 오후 4:51
IOTA funds are public: https://thetangle.org/address/IDNAFP9FWWKYGNDMKGJWZD9GATGRPTJYTYHLKFNDEQSISPSETLZQOSPGOHC99LMPXDEHSH9XYHNVOLUBBQPCEGHYK9 But they have probably other sources of income, like funding by government etc. And maybe also other IOTA funds on other addresses. I don't know.
Balance: 59.68 Ti


David Sønstebø어제 오후 9:41
I wonder how many times an out of context 2 year old private DM has to be addressed. At the time IOTA was approaching stagnation due to the actions of primarily CFB**, thus since we both started Jinn together which lead to IOTA,** I tried repeatedly to talk sense into him. I.E. "If you are going to torpedo all progress, let's just sell it all and start from scratch, fuck it" It's a figure of speech, while trying to talk sense into someone who insists that 1 + 1 = 3.59 My tax records show when I last sold iotas. February of 2018. Now stop reading into private DMs, especially ones taken out of context and especially those leaked by someone who's proclaimed he is going to ruin IOTA and my life. You need to go back to school if you think there is anything to 'speculate' on there.


dom어제 오후 4:15
u/unsy we will release the condensed version of them once we want to. Just because you so desperately desire them for whatever reason doesn't make us do it faster. Being in this space for so fucking long, last thing I want is to attempt to act in good faith again and then be screwed over by those trying to misconstrue reality and spread lies. We've been at that for too long. Once they are fully ready, and we have them in a format we like, we will publish them.


dom어제 오후 4:16
Our objective of the finance / legal department is to become one of the most trustworthy / transparent organizations in this space. Which is why we're setting up new and stricter policies in general


dom어제 오후 4:18
quite frankly, with everything that has happened up until now, I would certainly say that we are one of the most transparent organization (if we wanted it or not) u/unsy


dom어제 오후 4:21
u/unsy I am not worried about it. If we have problems, we always solve them - I think we've proven that by now. And as it stands right now with our current funding + our strategy, we are in good hands


David Sønstebø오늘 오전 6:41
Don't worry, a shitty FUD piece in a cryptoblog is nada
[오전 6:41]
We were once numero uno target by Jeffrey Epstein funded Joi Ito's MIT DCI
[오전 6:41]
This is nothing


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Antonio Nardella [IF]어제 오후 11:13
IMO the community has matured a lot, we have community and certified developers working with the IF in the X-Teams, there are new people coming in with direct interest in the tech (yeah, also spec is still popular) and from the chats that I've had, there are devs waiting for the breaking changes of Chrysalis P2, before starting to develop again.. But that's my assessment..


Jelle Millenaar [IF]어제 오후 9:15
Well, I can say the DID developments are going smooth. Starting publishing the first DIDs to the Tangle ;D


Jelle Millenaar [IF]어제 오후 9:15
And since I am totally not biased towards Identity, but its gonna be revolutionary ;D


Jelle Millenaar [IF]어제 오후 10:06
This is the perfect time to loose faith in the IOTA Foundations capability to deliver, especially after the network just received a major update with many improvements. Its just crypto being crypto,


dom오늘 오전 2:12
Yeh we'll go through it. This is the usual game...


Dominik Schiener
There is more tech maturity, more adoption and more progress than ever. We are one of the only projects which gets funding from government grants and corporations. Stop the attention grabbing headlines and get your sources right.


Long field
You can track their iota address, and I can tell they didn't sell any iota tokens in last two months


HusQy
IOTA is like a large decentralized network cable that connects any number of nodes with each other and that enables data and values ​​to be exchanged with one another, whereby the data is protected against manipulation and the value transactions against double spends. Thereon ...

... you can run any decentralized application (we call this layer) - e.g. a blockchain that stores certain data for as long as you want and limits the amount of data to be saved via fees like Bitcoin. Each of these uses inherit ...

... your security from the basic protocol and can specifically only save the data that is relevant for you (also decentralized). To say that IOTA is not a DLT is in principle not that wrong - it is a platform for DLTs and therefore much more powerful than all ...

... existing DLTs because it is much more flexible. For example, you can run Hashgraph in IOTA, or Bitcoin or whatever. And IOTA is the token that connects the entire ecosystem. This is of course "not yet" the case, but Chrysalis Part 2 is the first step.​


HusQy
@blocktrainerperhaps this explanation will enable you to understand where the journey is going. If a decentralized data storage is required, then you can build it with IOTA and it then has exactly the same properties in terms of permanent storage as Bitcoin.


Block trainer
We can also get a little more technical. The way you describe it, it sounds like an interoperability layer ... something like that here, which then equates to a polkadot etc.
📷

HusQy
In principle yes, only that it doesn't connect Bitcoin and ETH but "IOTA Smart Contracts" with "IOTA Storage" etc. It is not there to connect other projects but to offer the same as other projects, only faster and cheaper.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bitcoin Coach
And in 5 years there will be a completely new project, which then claims to be better than IOTA. And then should all the infrastructure be thrown overboard and the partners simply change the DLT?


HusQy
This is how technology works. It makes no sense to run the Internet on the basis of 64k modems just because many people have one at home. The change does not take place overnight but creeping and if you look at the BTC Dominance you can see that too.

Ultimately, everything will switch to the best technology and we'll see which that is :)


Block trainer
The "best" must also be defined. What are the classes to master?


HusQy
All classes. If there is a technology that can represent even one aspect better, then it is not yet good enough. Blockchain, for example, is a "degenerate" DAG with only one reference. The goal is that IOTA can also use blockchains if the use case requires it.


HusQy
The future is not "either DAG or blockchain" but both seamlessly linked within the same ecosystem. IOTA smart contracts use a blockchain, for example, but a separate chain for each smart contract and the blockchain is within the tangle.

Block trainer
According to the new definition, they are no longer saved ... A doublespent could change the reference retrospectively.


HusQy
That's not quite true. The tangle itself contains all information for all eternity and you cannot remove any information. Once the data has reached a certain age, it is no longer stored by every node in the network. But you can still ...

... still prove what happened in the part of the tangle that was "forgotten" by the nodes after a certain time. Now there are two ways to keep this evidence: 1. You save the evidence personally and can present it at any time. 2. Man ...​​

... writes a plug-in for the node, which monitors the Tangle for information of a certain type and keeps a copy of all car purchase-related data forever (or for at least 30 years, for example). All dealerships could then install this plugin and ...

... jointly store this data decentrally in order to query the information if necessary. However, you would only selectively save the data that interests you. The evidence they produce can still be verified by any node on the network.​​

If the server of a car dealership fails, it can download the data again from one of the other dealerships. Quasi like an application-related private blockchain which is secured by the Tangle. It is also conceivable that there are service providers for this ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


HusQy
Data is only kept immutable. How do you intend to execute a token transaction over pure data? I'm simply sending the following two data transactions at the same time: 1. I'm sending $ 100 from address A to address B. 2. I'm sending $ 100 from address A to address C.


HusQy
In order to determine which transaction is successful / came first, you need consensus. Data transactions do not allow token transfer.


Block trainer
Why doesn't that allow token transfer? I can simply use it to sign my values. The question is about the meaning of the token. I can also sign that I have transferred € 10 for the petrol station. Or I transmit the proof via curled BTC ...


HusQy
Did I just describe you can publish two conflicting data transactions and no one knows which is the correct one: P


Block trainer
Unless you agree on a consensus. Time stamp + BTC (locked) in hash = value transmitted ... What else is the IOTA token for?


HusQy
Whether information is correct can only be seen in the context. Take a look at the difference between "data" and "information". For example, you can claim that you locked Bitcoin even though it didn't.


Block trainer
I may need a proof of this. See how, for example, BTC is unlocked in liquid or in the LN. The IOTA data layer is extremely similar to the principle of Lightning. Accordingly, the sending of tokens would be possible here, which means that I see the use case of the IOTA coin at risk


HusQy
Such a proof is impossible. The reason why this works with LN nodes is because LN nodes are Bitcoin nodes that know what is happening in the Bitcoin network and have "information" and not just "data": P What you are describing is technically impossible.


Block trainer
Data = information What can the LN not, what IOTA can sometimes?


HusQy
That's not rubbish. There is a huge difference between data and information, and inter-chain transactions are not possible because of that very difference. LN won't work - there are too many game theory problems: P​

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dominik Schiener
There is more tech maturity, more adoption and more progress than ever. We are one of the only projects which gets funding from government grants and corporations. Stop the attention grabbing headlines and get your sources right.


Dominik Schiener
As an innovation leader in Europe, I certainly say we deserve to get grants. There is a below 7% success chance usually. And yes, everything is fully audited (by externals ofc), showing clearly how and that the money was used in achieving the milestones of the grant.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
submitted by btlkhs to Iota [link] [comments]

Official ColossusXT Q3 2020 AMA

Official ColossusXT Q3 2020 AMA
Welcome to the 11th official ColossusXT AMA! It has been an exciting year so far as we move closer to the launch of the Colossus Grid, and it's been interesting to see how COVID19 is affecting the world and the industry. The commitment to ColossusXT has never been stronger as we navigate these uncertain times due to COVID19. I will briefly go over development and business activities and if you have any additional questions about anything mentioned please drop a question in this AMA.
[DEV] As we move forward through Q3 the first thing you can expect is a mandatory wallet update in the coming weeks, this wallet update will allow you to convert your zCOLX back into COLX, along with some other notable features that we will dive into to discuss once the wallet is released. We're getting closer and closer to Armis release and the Colossus Grid release, which will prove to be an exciting time for the community to participate in testing and/or marketing activities.
[BIZ] We recently submitted a Project Pitch regarding ColossusXT to the National Science Foundation and have been invited to submit a full proposal. Should our proposal be accepted by the National Science Foundation we will be awarded 256,000 dollars for additional ColossusXT development, and continue onto Phase 2 proposals which will open up additional opportunities for ColossusXT research partnerships and additional funding opportunities.

https://preview.redd.it/gvypc52tjcm51.png?width=682&format=png&auto=webp&s=35af9143dea8f2294dc8c4c799810cee4add6e47
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This AMA will start on 10 September and end on 30 September.
The team will review and answer your questions no later than 10 October.
Before the AMA begins, everyone from the community can ask questions on this page and upvote/downvote according to your interest.
Rules:
Please do not reply to other user's questions until the team has answered. Try to be precise with your questions and be polite.
Contest: One person who asks a question will be chosen to receive 100,000 ColossusXT (COLX) and a ColossusXT T-Shirt!

https://preview.redd.it/cz6lixhzicm51.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=30ec43751a5556d11c5f26c3f7ab4a044494c73e

Processing img imldoefxgkm51...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About ColossusXT (COLX):
ColossusXT is an open-source, community-driven, environmentally conscious cryptocurrency, and an alternative to bitcoin that features better anonymity. It allows people to store and invest their wealth in a non-government-controlled currency and make almost instantaneous and completely anonymous transfers with close to zero fees. Colossuscoin V1 was founded as a long-standing, energy-efficient and environmentally friendly digital cryptocurrency and this concept is being continued.
The question format can be seen below:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Q: What is the Colossus Grid?
-----------------------------------------------------------
A: ColossusXT is an anonymous blockchain through obfuscation, along with the utilization of Armis (I2P). These features will protect end-user privacy as ColossusXT evolves into the Colossus Grid. The Colossus Grid will connect devices in a peer-to-peer network enabling users and applications to rent the cycles and storage of other users’ machines. This marketplace of computing power and storage will exclusively run on COLX currency. These resources will be used to complete tasks requiring any amount of computation time and capacity, or allow end-users to store data anonymously across the COLX decentralized network. Today, such resources are supplied by entities such as centralized cloud providers which are constrained by closed networks, proprietary payment systems, and hard-coded provisioning operations. Any user ranging from a single PC owner to a large data center can share resources through Colossus Grid and get paid in COLX for their contributions. Renters of computing power or storage space, on the other hand, may do so at low prices compared to the usual market prices because they are only using resources that already exist.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Why does your blockchain exist and what makes it unique?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A: ColossusXT exists to provide an energy-efficient method of supercomputing. ColossusXT is unique in many ways. Some coins have one layer of privacy. ColossusXT and the Colossus Grid will utilize two layers of privacy through obfuscation, and Armis (I2P) these will protect users of the Colossus Grid as they utilize grid resources. There are also Masternodes and Proof of Stake which both can contribute to reducing 51% attacks, along with instant transactions and zero-fee transactions. This protection is paramount as ColossusXT evolves into the Colossus Grid. Grid Computing will have a pivotal role throughout the world, and what this means is that users will begin to experience the Internet as a seamless computational universe. Software applications, databases, sensors, video, and audio streams-all will be reborn as services that live in cyberspace, assembling, and reassembling themselves on the fly to meet the tasks at hand. Once plugged into the grid, a desktop machine will draw computational horsepower from all the other computers on the grid.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Important Information:
Website
Whitepaper
Roadmap
Business Plan
Wiki
Governance
Partners
GitHub
What is ColossusXT? (YouTube)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow ColossusXT on:
Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Discord
Forums
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested in joining the ColossusXT team?
Contribute to an Idea!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMA History:
2018 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4
2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4
2020 Q1 2020 Q2
submitted by PioyPioyPioy to ColossuscoinX [link] [comments]

ALL of my stored cryptocurrency has been STOLEN from my Ledger Nano S!

Hey everyone... I recently logged into my account in Ledger Live expecting to see a great increase with the price of Bitcoin moving up. Instead of seeing what I expected to be about $13,000.00 worth of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, and Ethereum Classic, I see $0.00 balance on everything! I am absolutely blown away, saddened, and disappointed. I purchased the Nano S over two years ago BECAUSE of security. Now, it seems I have lost literally everything, and there is no phone number to contact this company, only through emails, which they have not responded to. I can clearly see all of the funds from every crypto I was holding were sent out to different addresess which have now all been confirmed on the blockchain. Does anyone here have any ideas at all as to what could have happened, or what I can do here? The only way I know of, that the funds can be accessed, is with the 24 word recovery phrase, and that has been written down on the card, by me 3 years ago, and been kept safely in a burn safe box all this time. So how in the world does something like this happen!? I heard about their data breach, and leaking customers info a couple weeks ago and I am wondering if somehow, someway, that access was gained to my wallet with info that was exposed? Can somebody help me here, or has this happened to anyone else in the last few days? Thanks.

UPDATE:
Okay, after reading through all these comments, and everybody saying I must have entered my passphrase on my computer or phone at some point, you guys are right. I forgot, that 3 years ago, when I purchased the Ledger, I wrote down the recovery phrase, and it's been in the burn safe since. BUT, I also, can't believe I'm saying this, but I did enter it into my phone, and sent it to my own email address, where it has been ever since, I guess thinking if I ever lost the paper with the 24 word phrase, or it was stolen, I would have it there, so I could recover my assets. Well, I guess that means somebody else can recover my assets too. :( This IS MY FAULT, and I take full blame for it. I guess I just never thought, without somebody having access to my e-mail that anyone would ever possibly be able to get access to it. It's just so weird, that it's been 3 years, and the assets were just now stolen. I've had close to that amount in there for a couple years now. Again, I thank you for your help and research, i'm to blame here. $13,000 lesson learned. NEVER INPUT YOUR RECOVERY PHRASE INTO DIGITAL FORMAT. Still wish there was something that could be done, but I know once it's gone, it's gone in crypto. Such a shame now that it looks like Bitcoin is beginning it's bull run.
submitted by James88215 to ledgerwallet [link] [comments]

blockchain support number☎️ ☎️ 𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓 ╬𝟗𝟒𝟓 ≭𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔☎️ ☎️ NUMBER USA CANADA $#[email protected]#&#@*[email protected]$$(%NDKJD

blockchain support number☎️ ☎️ 𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓 ╬𝟗𝟒𝟓 ≭𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔☎️ ☎️ NUMBER USA CANADA $#[email protected]#&#@*[email protected]$$(%NDKJD

Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
In the improvement of the web, one can highlight milestone occasions that can be utilized to isolate the cycle into stages. Among these significant milestones are the production of the principal wide-zone PC networks during the 1960s, the improvement of an electronic mail framework during the 1970s, the formation of ethernet later in that decade, the starting of the internet during the 1990s and the making of the main programs and web indexes later in that decade, among others. Following every one of these trademark improvements, the web changed in a sensational way. Each progression was vital in making the web that we know and depend on today.
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Likewise, it's conceivable to think back on the advancement blockchain and furthermore partition it into stages which are separated by significant turns of events and developments. Blockchain innovation has just been in presence for a small amount of the time that the web has, so it's presumable this blockchain to come. Indeed, even now, however, specialists have started to partition the historical backdrop of blockchain into in any event three significant stages.
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Stage 1: blockchain and Digital Currencies
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
While the thoughts that would go into the blockchain were twirling around in software engineering networks, it was the pseudonymous designer of, who plot the blockchain as we probably am aware it in the for BTC. Along these lines, blockchain innovation started with the Bitcoin organization. While blockchain has since proceeded to see use in an immense assortment of in some sense it was planned extraordinarily for this and for propelling the objectives of computerized monetary forms all the more comprehensively.
In the most punctual stages, blockchain set up of a mutual public record that bolsters a digital money organization. Satoshi's concept of blockchain utilizes 1 megabyte (MB) squares of data on bitcoin exchanges. Squares are connected together through a , framing a changeless chain. Indeed, even in its most punctual appearances, blockchain innovation set up huge numbers of the focal highlights of these frameworks, which remain today. To be sure, bitcoin's blockchain remains to a great extent unaltered from these most punctual endeavors.
Stage 2: Smart Contracts
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
As time went on, designers started to accept that a blockchain could accomplish more than just record exchanges. Authors of , for example, had the possibility that and trust arrangements could likewise profit by blockchain the board. Thusly, ethereum speaks to the second-age of the blockchain innovation.
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
The significant advancement achieved by ethereum was the appearance of keen agreements. Normally, contracts in the standard business world are overseen between two separate substances, in some cases with different elements aiding the oversight cycle. Shrewd agreements are those that are self-overseeing on a blockchain. They are set off by an occasion like the death of an or the accomplishment of a specific value objective; accordingly, the oversees itself, making changes varying and without the contribution of outside elements.
Now, we may in any case be currently tackling the undiscovered capability of brilliant agreements. In this way, regardless of whether we have genuinely proceeded onward to the resulting phase of the advancement of blockchain is easy to refute.
Stage 3: The Future
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
One of the significant issues confronting blockchain is scaling. Bitcoin stays disturbed by exchange preparing times and Many new advanced monetary forms have endeavored to overhaul their blockchains so as to oblige these issues, yet with shifting degrees of progress. Later on, one of the most significant improvements preparing for blockchain innovation going ahead will probably have to do with adaptability.
submitted by Comprehensive_Rain85 to u/Comprehensive_Rain85 [link] [comments]

blockchain helpline number 🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️ ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡ 🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️

blockchain helpline number 🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️ ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡ 🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️

blockchain helpline number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
In the improvement of the web, one can highlight milestone occasions that can be utilized to isolate the cycle into stages. Among these significant milestones are the production of the principal wide-zone PC networks during the 1960s, the improvement of an electronic mail framework during the 1970s, the formation of ethernet later in that decade, the starting of the internet during the 1990s and the making of the main programs and web indexes later in that decade, among others. Following every one of these trademark improvements, the web changed in a sensational way. Each progression was vital in making the web that we know and depend on today.
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Likewise, it's conceivable to think back on the advancement blockchain and furthermore partition it into stages which are separated by significant turns of events and developments. Blockchain innovation has just been in presence for a small amount of the time that the web has, so it's presumable this blockchain to come. Indeed, even now, however, specialists have started to partition the historical backdrop of blockchain into in any event three significant stages.
blockchain helpline number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Stage 1: blockchain and Digital Currencies
blockchain helpline number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
While the thoughts that would go into the blockchain were twirling around in software engineering networks, it was the pseudonymous designer of, who plot the blockchain as we probably am aware it in the for BTC. Along these lines, blockchain innovation started with the Bitcoin organization. While blockchain has since proceeded to see use in an immense assortment of in some sense it was planned extraordinarily for this and for propelling the objectives of computerized monetary forms all the more comprehensively.
In the most punctual stages, blockchain set up of a mutual public record that bolsters a digital money organization. Satoshi's concept of blockchain utilizes 1 megabyte (MB) squares of data on bitcoin exchanges. Squares are connected together through a , framing a changeless chain. Indeed, even in its most punctual appearances, blockchain innovation set up huge numbers of the focal highlights of these frameworks, which remain today. To be sure, bitcoin's blockchain remains to a great extent unaltered from these most punctual endeavors.
Stage 2: Smart Contracts
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
As time went on, designers started to accept that a blockchain could accomplish more than just record exchanges. Authors of , for example, had the possibility that and trust arrangements could likewise profit by blockchain the board. Thusly, ethereum speaks to the second-age of the blockchain innovation.
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
The significant advancement achieved by ethereum was the appearance of keen agreements. Normally, contracts in the standard business world are overseen between two separate substances, in some cases with different elements aiding the oversight cycle. Shrewd agreements are those that are self-overseeing on a blockchain. They are set off by an occasion like the death of an or the accomplishment of a specific value objective; accordingly, the oversees itself, making changes varying and without the contribution of outside elements.
Now, we may in any case be currently tackling the undiscovered capability of brilliant agreements. In this way, regardless of whether we have genuinely proceeded onward to the resulting phase of the advancement of blockchain is easy to refute.
Stage 3: The Future
blockchain helpline number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
One of the significant issues confronting blockchain is scaling. Bitcoin stays disturbed by exchange preparing times and Many new advanced monetary forms have endeavored to overhaul their blockchains so as to oblige these issues, yet with shifting degrees of progress. Later on, one of the most significant improvements preparing for blockchain innovation going ahead will probably have to do with adaptability.
submitted by Traditional-Rip-4623 to u/Traditional-Rip-4623 [link] [comments]

blockchain complaint number 📞📞 【𝟖𝟓𝟓-𝟗𝟒𝟓-𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔】📞📞 NUMBER USA CANADA $#[email protected]#&#@*[email protected]$$(%NDKJD

blockchain complaint number 📞📞 【𝟖𝟓𝟓-𝟗𝟒𝟓-𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔】📞📞 NUMBER USA CANADA $#[email protected]#&#@*[email protected]$$(%NDKJD

blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
In the improvement of the web, one can highlight milestone occasions that can be utilized to isolate the cycle into stages. Among these significant milestones are the production of the principal wide-zone PC networks during the 1960s, the improvement of an electronic mail framework during the 1970s, the formation of ethernet later in that decade, the starting of the internet during the 1990s and the making of the main programs and web indexes later in that decade, among others. Following every one of these trademark improvements, the web changed in a sensational way. Each progression was vital in making the web that we know and depend on today.
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Likewise, it's conceivable to think back on the advancement blockchain and furthermore partition it into stages which are separated by significant turns of events and developments. Blockchain innovation has just been in presence for a small amount of the time that the web has, so it's presumable this blockchain to come. Indeed, even now, however, specialists have started to partition the historical backdrop of blockchain into in any event three significant stages.
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Stage 1: blockchain and Digital Currencies
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
While the thoughts that would go into the blockchain were twirling around in software engineering networks, it was the pseudonymous designer of, who plot the blockchain as we probably am aware it in the for BTC. Along these lines, blockchain innovation started with the Bitcoin organization. While blockchain has since proceeded to see use in an immense assortment of in some sense it was planned extraordinarily for this and for propelling the objectives of computerized monetary forms all the more comprehensively.
In the most punctual stages, blockchain set up of a mutual public record that bolsters a digital money organization. Satoshi's concept of blockchain utilizes 1 megabyte (MB) squares of data on bitcoin exchanges. Squares are connected together through a , framing a changeless chain. Indeed, even in its most punctual appearances, blockchain innovation set up huge numbers of the focal highlights of these frameworks, which remain today. To be sure, bitcoin's blockchain remains to a great extent unaltered from these most punctual endeavors.
Stage 2: Smart Contracts
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
As time went on, designers started to accept that a blockchain could accomplish more than just record exchanges. Authors of , for example, had the possibility that and trust arrangements could likewise profit by blockchain the board. Thusly, ethereum speaks to the second-age of the blockchain innovation.
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
The significant advancement achieved by ethereum was the appearance of keen agreements. Normally, contracts in the standard business world are overseen between two separate substances, in some cases with different elements aiding the oversight cycle. Shrewd agreements are those that are self-overseeing on a blockchain. They are set off by an occasion like the death of an or the accomplishment of a specific value objective; accordingly, the oversees itself, making changes varying and without the contribution of outside elements.
Now, we may in any case be currently tackling the undiscovered capability of brilliant agreements. In this way, regardless of whether we have genuinely proceeded onward to the resulting phase of the advancement of blockchain is easy to refute.
Stage 3: The Future
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
One of the significant issues confronting blockchain is scaling. Bitcoin stays disturbed by exchange preparing times and Many new advanced monetary forms have endeavored to overhaul their blockchains so as to oblige these issues, yet with shifting degrees of progress. Later on, one of the most significant improvements preparing for blockchain innovation going ahead will probably have to do with adaptability.
submitted by Comfortable-Ad-833 to u/Comfortable-Ad-833 [link] [comments]

blockchain complaint number ∰𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓 ╬𝟗𝟒𝟓 ≭𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔 ∰TOLLFREE NUMBER (24/7) HOURS AVAIBLE$#[email protected]#&*&#@(*^&#OIYTRVBZ

blockchain complaint number ∰𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟓 ╬𝟗𝟒𝟓 ≭𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔 ∰TOLLFREE NUMBER (24/7) HOURS AVAIBLE$#[email protected]#&&#@(&#OIYTRVBZ

blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
In the improvement of the web, one can highlight milestone occasions that can be utilized to isolate the cycle into stages. Among these significant milestones are the production of the principal wide-zone PC networks during the 1960s, the improvement of an electronic mail framework during the 1970s, the formation of ethernet later in that decade, the starting of the internet during the 1990s and the making of the main programs and web indexes later in that decade, among others. Following every one of these trademark improvements, the web changed in a sensational way. Each progression was vital in making the web that we know and depend on today.
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Likewise, it's conceivable to think back on the advancement blockchain and furthermore partition it into stages which are separated by significant turns of events and developments. Blockchain innovation has just been in presence for a small amount of the time that the web has, so it's presumable this blockchain to come. Indeed, even now, however, specialists have started to partition the historical backdrop of blockchain into in any event three significant stages.
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Stage 1: blockchain and Digital Currencies
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
While the thoughts that would go into the blockchain were twirling around in software engineering networks, it was the pseudonymous designer of, who plot the blockchain as we probably am aware it in the for BTC. Along these lines, blockchain innovation started with the Bitcoin organization. While blockchain has since proceeded to see use in an immense assortment of in some sense it was planned extraordinarily for this and for propelling the objectives of computerized monetary forms all the more comprehensively.
In the most punctual stages, blockchain set up of a mutual public record that bolsters a digital money organization. Satoshi's concept of blockchain utilizes 1 megabyte (MB) squares of data on bitcoin exchanges. Squares are connected together through a , framing a changeless chain. Indeed, even in its most punctual appearances, blockchain innovation set up huge numbers of the focal highlights of these frameworks, which remain today. To be sure, bitcoin's blockchain remains to a great extent unaltered from these most punctual endeavors.
Stage 2: Smart Contracts
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
As time went on, designers started to accept that a blockchain could accomplish more than just record exchanges. Authors of , for example, had the possibility that and trust arrangements could likewise profit by blockchain the board. Thusly, ethereum speaks to the second-age of the blockchain innovation.
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
The significant advancement achieved by ethereum was the appearance of keen agreements. Normally, contracts in the standard business world are overseen between two separate substances, in some cases with different elements aiding the oversight cycle. Shrewd agreements are those that are self-overseeing on a blockchain. They are set off by an occasion like the death of an or the accomplishment of a specific value objective; accordingly, the oversees itself, making changes varying and without the contribution of outside elements.
Now, we may in any case be currently tackling the undiscovered capability of brilliant agreements. In this way, regardless of whether we have genuinely proceeded onward to the resulting phase of the advancement of blockchain is easy to refute.
Stage 3: The Future
blockchain complaint number☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
One of the significant issues confronting blockchain is scaling. Bitcoin stays disturbed by exchange preparing times and Many new advanced monetary forms have endeavored to overhaul their blockchains so as to oblige these issues, yet with shifting degrees of progress. Later on, one of the most significant improvements preparing for blockchain innovation going ahead will probably have to do with adaptability.
submitted by Heavy-Builder-1320 to u/Heavy-Builder-1320 [link] [comments]

♨♛ +𝟏 𝟖𝟓𝟓☰𝟗𝟒𝟓☰𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔 ♨♛ blockchain support number♨♛ +𝟏 𝟖𝟓𝟓☰𝟗𝟒𝟓☰𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔 ♨♛ NUMBER USA CANADA $#[email protected]#&#@*[email protected]$$(%NDKJD

♨♛ +𝟏 𝟖𝟓𝟓☰𝟗𝟒𝟓☰𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔 ♨♛ blockchain support number♨♛ +𝟏 𝟖𝟓𝟓☰𝟗𝟒𝟓☰𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔 ♨♛ NUMBER USA CANADA $#[email protected]#&#@*[email protected]$$(%NDKJD

Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
In the improvement of the web, one can highlight milestone occasions that can be utilized to isolate the cycle into stages. Among these significant milestones are the production of the principal wide-zone PC networks during the 1960s, the improvement of an electronic mail framework during the 1970s, the formation of ethernet later in that decade, the starting of the internet during the 1990s and the making of the main programs and web indexes later in that decade, among others. Following every one of these trademark improvements, the web changed in a sensational way. Each progression was vital in making the web that we know and depend on today.
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Likewise, it's conceivable to think back on the advancement blockchain and furthermore partition it into stages which are separated by significant turns of events and developments. Blockchain innovation has just been in presence for a small amount of the time that the web has, so it's presumable this blockchain to come. Indeed, even now, however, specialists have started to partition the historical backdrop of blockchain into in any event three significant stages.
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Stage 1: blockchain and Digital Currencies
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
While the thoughts that would go into the blockchain were twirling around in software engineering networks, it was the pseudonymous designer of, who plot the blockchain as we probably am aware it in the for BTC. Along these lines, blockchain innovation started with the Bitcoin organization. While blockchain has since proceeded to see use in an immense assortment of in some sense it was planned extraordinarily for this and for propelling the objectives of computerized monetary forms all the more comprehensively.
In the most punctual stages, blockchain set up of a mutual public record that bolsters a digital money organization. Satoshi's concept of blockchain utilizes 1 megabyte (MB) squares of data on bitcoin exchanges. Squares are connected together through a , framing a changeless chain. Indeed, even in its most punctual appearances, blockchain innovation set up huge numbers of the focal highlights of these frameworks, which remain today. To be sure, bitcoin's blockchain remains to a great extent unaltered from these most punctual endeavors.
Stage 2: Smart Contracts
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
As time went on, designers started to accept that a blockchain could accomplish more than just record exchanges. Authors of , for example, had the possibility that and trust arrangements could likewise profit by blockchain the board. Thusly, ethereum speaks to the second-age of the blockchain innovation.
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
The significant advancement achieved by ethereum was the appearance of keen agreements. Normally, contracts in the standard business world are overseen between two separate substances, in some cases with different elements aiding the oversight cycle. Shrewd agreements are those that are self-overseeing on a blockchain. They are set off by an occasion like the death of an or the accomplishment of a specific value objective; accordingly, the oversees itself, making changes varying and without the contribution of outside elements.
Now, we may in any case be currently tackling the undiscovered capability of brilliant agreements. In this way, regardless of whether we have genuinely proceeded onward to the resulting phase of the advancement of blockchain is easy to refute.
Stage 3: The Future
Blockchain support number ☏+l―855︽𝟗𝟒𝟓︽𝟑𝟏𝟔𝟔℡
One of the significant issues confronting blockchain is scaling. Bitcoin stays disturbed by exchange preparing times and Many new advanced monetary forms have endeavored to overhaul their blockchains so as to oblige these issues, yet with shifting degrees of progress. Later on, one of the most significant improvements preparing for blockchain innovation going ahead will probably have to do with adaptability.
submitted by NoLobster6267 to u/NoLobster6267 [link] [comments]

Lawnmower - Bitcoin & Blockchain Investing, News & Market Data Extracting data from the bitcoin blockchain Bitcoin SV: The Enteprise Blockchain for Big Data Blockchain: Transactions, Blocks and Adding Data Analyzing Blockchain and Bitcoin Transaction Data as a Graph

Resumo: se você poderá fazer o que deseja fazer depende dos dados que deseja. Mad File Format Science. Formatos de arquivo, validação de arquivos, software de arquivamento e outras coisas estranhas. O formato bitcoin blockchain. A criptografia Bitcoin depende da segurança e da confiança. Bitcoin looks like a classic case of a format that’s good enough and is so popular that replacing it with something better is hard. Is Bitcoin truly decentralized? It depends on one blockchain database, however many copies it has, and on one set of software, even if it’s open source. The data in "coinbase" can be anything; it isn't used. Bitcoin puts the current compact-format target and the arbitrary-precision "extraNonce" number there, which increments every time the Nonce field in the block header overflows. Outputs can be anything, but Bitcoin creates one exactly like an IP address transaction. MVRV is calculated by dividing Market Value by Realised Value. In Realised Value, BTC prices are taken at the time they last moved, instead of the current price like in Market Value The Data Directory is the location where Bitcoin's data files are stored, including the wallet data file. Data directory. ... Contains blockchain data. blk*.dat Stored are actual Bitcoin blocks, in network format, dumped to disk raw.

[index] [12937] [11608] [24410] [29609] [6693] [8530] [16774] [31579] [26010] [4660]

Lawnmower - Bitcoin & Blockchain Investing, News & Market Data

http://bit.ly/1AJOQiZ Ever wondered what it would be like if you couldn’t prove your home, or even the land it’s built on, was actually yours? Ever pondered ... If you like to join our community, discuss about trading, share news and talk about Bitcoin & crypto join us on Discord : https://discord.gg/YjyBP6W 💙Follow me on twitter : https://twitter.com ... All historical data are in the big query-public-data:bitcoin_blockchain dataset, which updates every 10 minutes. We hope that by making the data more transparent, users of the data can gain a ... Check price quotes & follow Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dash, and other top blockchain assets with no account required. Begin investing with a bank account in less than 2 minutes with as little ... In this video, we will take the output of a blockparser and use linux tools to extract specific data like addresses, blockhashes and merkleroots. We will also learn that some wallets take Bitcoin ...

#